How can government programs ensure that projects stay on track, meet performance goals, and comply with rigorous management standards? Two critical processes help achieve this: the Integrated Baseline Review (IBR) and Earned Value Management System (EVMS) Surveillance. The IBR ensures that project baselines are realistic and achievable, identifying risks early and aligning expectations between contractors and the government. Meanwhile, EVMS Surveillance continuously monitors compliance with Earned Value Management guidelines, ensuring that performance data remains accurate and reliable for decision-making. Together, these processes provide a structured approach to managing complex projects effectively. Curious about how they work and why they matter? Read on to explore their key principles and impact.
Integrated Baseline Review
The “Integrated Baseline Review”(IBR) process reviews the entire project planning in detail after the contract is awarded for government projects. This review ensures the planning is sound before it is accepted and established as the foundation for future performance measurement.
The Air Force defined SAF/AQ Policy 94A-015 in September 1994, which defines basic guidelines for conducting the Integrated Baseline Review. In April 2003, the DoD published “The Program Managers’ Guide to the Integrated Baseline Review Process”, which further details this process. According to DoD procurement guidance, all contracts for which EVM is required must conduct an Integrated Baseline Review.
What is an IBR?
An Integrated Baseline Review (IBR) is a collaborative review conducted by both the contractor and the government to thoroughly assess a project’s or program’s baseline. The main objectives of an IBR are to:
- Verify the Project Scope: Ensure the technical scope covers all required work and aligns with the authorization documents.
- Validate Milestones: Confirm that key milestones are clearly defined and logically sequenced.
- Assess Budgets, Schedules, and Resources: Evaluate whether the allocated budgets, schedules, and resources are appropriate and sufficient for the project.
- Check Management Controls: Ensure that effective management control processes are in place.
- Evaluate Work Packages: Confirm that work packages are structured for objective measurement using Earned Value Management (EVM) techniques, with a focus on minimizing the use of Level of Effort (LOE).
The Result of the IBR
An Integrated Baseline Review (IBR) yields several important outcomes:
- Feasibility Assessment: Confirms the program’s feasibility based on the technical scope, schedule, budget, and available resources.
- Risk Awareness: Develops and strengthens a shared understanding of the risks associated with the project scope.
- Expectation Alignment: Compares program expectations to identify and address discrepancies early.
- Enhanced Management Insight: Improves understanding of the program by all stakeholders.
- Early Warning Signals: Identifies potential issues early, allowing for timely corrective action.
IBRs are specifically designed to foster a mutual understanding of the risks in the contractor’s performance plans and the supporting management control systems. When conducted correctly, they serve as a vital component of the program manager’s risk management strategy.
An IBR is not an audit, a test of Earned Value Management System (EVMS) compliance, or a formal project review. Instead, IBRs are initiated within six months of the contract award and are repeated after significant program changes to ensure alignment and address new risks.
EVMS Surveillance
EVMS Surveillance refers to the process of monitoring and evaluating an organization’s Earned Value Management System (EVMS) to ensure it complies with established standards, policies, and procedures, typically in the context of programs of the American Government as soon as EIA 748 Contract Compliance is required from the contractor. Surveillance is often performed several times for large programs, e.g. annually.
There are four main objectives for evaluating a contractor’s certified EVMS.
- Data Quality: Ensure that the Earned Value Management (EVM) data is accurate, timely, and effective for decision-making.
- Decision-Making: Assess whether and how the EVM data is being used to make informed project decisions.
- Process Compliance: Confirm that the program is following the contractor’s internal processes.
- Guideline Adherence: Verify compliance with the EIA-748 standards and guidelines.
The Surveillance Team
For government programs, the surveillance team is typically led by representatives from the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA). The team also includes contractor employees to ensure collaboration. Surveillance activities aim not only to identify inconsistencies but also to provide recommendations for resolving any identified issues.
Key Guidelines for EVMS Surveillance
The following documents and standards serve as the foundation for conducting surveillance:
- ANSI/EIA-748 Guidelines
- NDIA PMSC Intent Guide
- Customer-Specific Guides, such as the Earned Value Management Implementation Guide (EVMIG)
- Contractor-Specific Processes, including site or program-specific regulations and instructions
Important Distinctions
EVMS Surveillance is not an audit, and there is no “pass” or “fail” outcome. Instead, it is a collaborative process designed to ensure that the EVMS remains effective and compliant while supporting continuous improvement.
Here You Can Find Even More Knowledge
Would you like to learn more about how to make your projects more successful with Project Control and Earned Value Management? My book “Earned Value Management – Essential Guide” takes you an important step further!
Do you know somebody who might be interested in this article? Then simply forward it or share it. Thank you!
